Code: | LEM11104 | Sigla: | IP |
Áreas Científicas | |
---|---|
Classificação | Área Científica |
OFICIAL | Informática |
Ativa? | Yes |
Unidade Responsável: | Departamento de Sistemas e Informática |
Curso/CE Responsável: |
Sigla | Nº de Estudantes | Plano de Estudos | Anos Curriculares | Créditos UCN | Créditos ECTS | Horas de Contacto | Horas Totais |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EM | 93 | Plano de Estudos | 1 | - | 6 | 75 | 162 |
Docente | Responsabilidade |
---|---|
Alcina Maria Narciso Prata |
Theorethical and Practical : | 3,00 |
Practical and Laboratory: | 2,00 |
Type | Docente | Turmas | Horas |
---|---|---|---|
Theorethical and Practical | Totais | 2 | 6,00 |
Alcina Maria Narciso Prata | 6,00 | ||
Practical and Laboratory | Totais | 4 | 8,00 |
Alcina Maria Narciso Prata | 4,00 | ||
Rui Fernando Spranger Rosa | 4,00 |
Understanding basic concepts and principles of computer operation.
Development of logical and formal thinking skills for complex problems analysis.
Understanding of conceptual foundations related to computer programming:
- Understanding the general principles of software engineering;
- Understanding the central role of Algorithm;
- Ability to code (implement) algorithms in programming languages.
In theoretical terms, it is intended to alert the students to the role and importance of the programming languages and to the concepts associated with their use.
In practical terms and considering the growing importance of the high-level languages, it is expected that the students learn how to use the VBA programming language.
Designation | Peso (%) |
---|---|
Apresentação/discussão de um trabalho científico | 40,00 |
Teste | 60,00 |
Total: | 100,00 |
Designation | Tempo (Horas) |
---|---|
Apresentação/discussão de um trabalho científico | 2,00 |
Elaboração de projeto | 40,00 |
Estudo autónomo | 30,00 |
Frequência das aulas | 75,00 |
Trabalho laboratorial | 10,00 |
Total: | 157,00 |
Continuous Evaluation
The continuous evaluation (CE) grade is calculated as presented next:
CE Final Grade = 0,6 TP + 0,4 PL
Considering that:
TP = 0,5 Test1 + 0,5 Test2
The PL minimum grade is 9,5 and is calculated as follows:
PL = 0,35 Trab1 + 0,35 Trab2 + 0,2 Exer +0,1 Part
If any of the mentioned grades is lower than the minimum values described above, the student will have to repeat, through an exam, just the evaluation component(s) to which (s)he has failed. NOTE: the components will keep the minimum grade values and the percentual value (that is: 0,6 TP + 0,4 PL), to calculate the student final grade.
Final Evaluation
There are three phases of final evaluation:
Normal Phase (1st phase):
The normal phase is based on an exam with both components: TP and PL. The TP component is worth 60% of the final grade while the PL component is worth 40% of the final grade. The minimum grade of each component is 9,5. If the exam grade is inferior to 10 the student will not be approved.
The students from continuous evaluation only need to do, through exam, the component(s) to which they have failed.
Resource Phase (2nd phase):
The resource phase is based on an exam with both components: TP and PL. The TP component is worth 60% of the final grade while the PL component is worth 40% of the final grade. The minimum grade of each component is 9,5. If the exam grade is inferior to 10 the student will not be approved.
The students from continuous evaluation only need to do, through exam, the component(s) to which they have failed.
Special Phase:
The special phase is based on an exam with both components: TP and PL. The TP component is worth 60% of the final grade while the PL component is worth 40% of the final grade. The minimum grade of each component is 9,5. If the exam grade is inferior to 10 the student will not be approved.